From:  Dick Eastman
Date:  Fri Feb 20, 2004  4:49 am
Subject:  The Attack on the Pentagon -- Proof of the Frame-up

 
Pentagon 9-11.
 
Inside-job.
 
Black-op.
 
Frame-up.
 
False-flag
 
Mass-murder.
 
Treason.
 
Conspiracy.
 
 
 
Here is the proof.
 
 
I.  Security camera shows the wrong plane, the wrong explosion and the discrepant trail of an air-to-ground missile.
 
 
Note the tail fin of the attacking jet,  visible only in  the
first picture, sticking  up behind the yellow  parking-pass
machine in  the foreground.  Observe also the white
missile smoke trailing behind.  Compare this  with these
two pictures of an F-16 jet  fighter firing an air-to-ground
missile, above  right  and below.
 
 
 
The sequence of five pictures indicate by simple inspection:
 
1) a plane that is too short,
 
2) a trail of missile smoke leading directly to,
 
3) a white-hot flash explosion consistent with an exploding
 missile warhead and totally inconsistent with an aluminum
jetliner carrying orange-red-burning jet-fuel kerosene hitting
a limestone, brick and concrete office building.
 
 
Note  the absence of an  airliner's long fuselage projecting out to
the left from behind the yellow obstruction -- the absence of a
shiny aluminum American Airlines Boeing 757 fuselage in the
direct morning sunlight.
 
What can be more unreasonable, than the contention that what is
hidden behind this view-obstructing cabinet  could possibly be aircraft
of the type  accurately  scaled below by civil engineers at Purdue
University?
 
simulation1.jpg (19037 bytes) 
 
Think about it.  The Boeing 757 is 155 ft long. The five- floor Pentagon
is only 71 feet tall.   A Boeing 757,  if stood on its tail and put up against
the wall, would stand more than twice the height of the wall, yet consider
how short relative to the height of the wall, the aircraft must be that is
hidden behind the yellow parking-pass cabinet obstruction -- the 75 ft.
length of the F-16 is about the maximum length these geometric constraints
will allow for the "killer jet."
 

Let's call  it the "Stegosaurus proof." . The Boeing 757 is long enough to fit six
and a fraction of its large tail fins (measured from near the base)  along its 155 ft. back, like the plates on the back of a  Stegosaurus  -- whereas the yellow parking-pass cabinet in the foregroud conceals at most only five lengths of the tail-fin image
showing  above and behind the cabinet .   The cabinet can  conceal a "Stegasaurus"
with five tail-fin plates of the size shown, but cannot conceal all of  a longer Stegasaurus with six or seven such plates along its back.  If the killer jet  were a 6+ -plate Stegosaurus we would have be see its head extending out behind the cabinet on the left side.   And so by such reasoning we are forced to conclude that the tail fin shown is not the tail fin of a Boeing 757.  We don't see the  shiny nose of an American Airlines Boeing 757  airliner,   when in fact the entire cockpit  would have had to have been showing if this plane was Flight 77. 
 
 
In the second frame the white-hot explosion rises about 120 feet into the air.

Note how the flash-bulb brightness of the high-explosive lights up the
vacinity like a flash bulb, compared with the other pictures in the
sequence

See  how the smoke and flames continues the  dazzing show, enabling
the Boeing to continue on its  way to Reagan National with all eyes
diverted -- and remember that the overflying Boeing would be
closer to Reagan National than to the crash point in about 3.5
seconds, about the time it would take eyes to adjust to the flashbulb
effect of initial missile explosion.  The white hot explosion is probably
nothing more than 19th-century "flash powder" from before the invention
of the flash bulb  -- so that people viewing the attack from the west,
would not only have the mid-morning sun in their eyes, but the 120 ft
bright flash as well -- yielding significant momentary vision impairment
to those who happened to be looking directly at it. 
 
 
 
All that remains is the simple determination that the small attacking jet crashed into
the Pentagon as the Boeing which all witnesses were watching disappeared into
the smoke (and for some the bright 9:00 a.m. sun appearing behind the  west wall)
and, like a magician exiting the stage in a cloud of smoke, absconded to Reagan
National Airport only one mile away.
 
    
 
Click for larger version
 
The 757 became just one more plane landing in the national emergency.
 
 
The true dimensions of the murder weapon have been discovered and
with them the true murderers.  The deception implicates the the top
Pentagon leadership.  Clearly they attempted to draw suspicion away
from themselves by having it seem that a large jetliner had also come
after them.  We see however that what really occured was a  psy-op
disinformation operation, one that still involved the deaths of many
Pentagon personel.  
 
As for the specific plane that performed  the missile attack and crash,
I suspect the F-16 Flying Falcon.  This plane has the capability and
the availability, and what could be more natural than that the proported
hijacked plane be "chased" all the way to the target  by the standard
interceptor of the United States Air Force?  Even if identified afterwards
it could be said that the plane crashed in the line of duty.
 
A fully remote-controlled F-16 was retired to the General Dynamics
museum early in 2001, perhaps with the remote control equipment
removed.
 
   The F-16 Falcon -  Probable Murder Weapon
 
F-16 equipped for remote-control warfare
 
Span: 32 ft. 10 in.
Length: 49 ft. 6 in.
Height: 16 ft. 6 in.
Weight: 29,896 lbs. loaded
Armament: One air-to-ground missile and electronic countermeasure pods
Ground Control:   Structural provisions and "power by wire" systems
architecture expanding multi-role performance to include precision strike,
night attack and beyond-visual-range interception missions utilizing
touch-sensitive remote virtual cockpit displays. 
Targeting: Remote  targeting lasers and computers, and new autopilot and
ground-avoidance systems allowing faster remote controlled flight  while
seeking and attacking targets. 
Maneuvering:  digital flight controls, a voice- activated maneuvering system
allowing the pilot to "point" the aircraft in unusual flight attitudes.
Engine: One Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-200 of
23,830 lbs. thrust.
Crew: None (remote controllers)
Maximum speed: 1,345 mph.
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 37,500 pounds (16,875 kilograms)
Cruising speed: 577 mph.
Range: 1,407 miles
Remote Control: System Planning Corproation's Command Transmitter
Systems (CTS) 
Frequency Range: 400-550 MHz in 100-kHz steps
RF Output Power:Exciter: 20 Watts; HPA: 1 kW
RF Power Control: 1-dB steps, 60-dB total range
Permissible Antenna VSWR:  2:1 continuously, 50 ohms nom.
Harmonics:  -50 dBc at 1 kW
Spurious:  -80 dBc at 1 kW
Modulation:  FM
Deviation:±  300 kHz
Modulation Range:Internal:  7.5-73.95 kHz (IRIG-B tone frequencies)
Prime Power:180-228 VAC 3-phase Wye connection, 47-63 Hz; 5 kVA maximum per rack, two connectors required (supplied); entrance at bottom center of each rack
Local Control, RF Power Monitor, and Exciter:  supplied  by 120 VAC nom. single-phase by the HPA power supply Cooling: Forced air; all exhausts through rear panels
 
The killer jet partially seen in the security video picture may not have been the F-16, but that plane fits everything that is known of the attacker.  The fact that at least one plane exists that satisifies the characteristics criteria demanded by the evidence establishes that while the evidence indicates that profile of the killer jet does not match the Boeing 757, that there is at least one aircraft that does match all that we have verified about the murder weapon.

======
 
Conclusion:
 
We have three independent proofs establishing that the Boeing 757 was not the jet aircraft that attacked the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.  These are the naked proofs in their stark pristine logic.  The reader may now wish to familiarize himself with all of the environing details from which the critical features of these proofs were abstracted.  Let the reader assure himself that what has been proven above is exactly the account that is most consistent with all of the other established facts of the case.  Here, below, is all of the other relevant information omitted from the above because it was not necessary in developing the three proofs.